Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gxtracker" data-source="post: 63110" data-attributes="member: 14004">Re: PVR-150 vs PVR-250Actually going to the 250 from the 150 would be a jump down. The 250 was the original version from Hauppauge, and the 150 is a revised version with a newer hardware encoder and DAC.As for your Celeron, it should be more than fine. Even if you were to get a software encoding card, depending on the cards drivers, you would be ok. I tested my old ASUS 7134 Tuner with an old Athlon 1900+ with MP 0.2.0.0 RC4 - and it was able to record video with no skipped frames. CPU usage was around 80%, so even though you could record with it, you couldn't really do much else on the system until recording was over. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite16" alt=":cry:" title="Crying&nbsp; &nbsp; :cry:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cry:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="gxtracker, post: 63110, member: 14004"] [b]Re: PVR-150 vs PVR-250[/b] Actually going to the 250 from the 150 would be a jump [u]down[/u]. The 250 was the original version from Hauppauge, and the 150 is a revised version with a newer hardware encoder and DAC. As for your Celeron, it should be more than fine. Even if you were to get a software encoding card, depending on the cards drivers, you would be ok. I tested my old ASUS 7134 Tuner with an old Athlon 1900+ with MP 0.2.0.0 RC4 - and it was able to record video with no skipped frames. CPU usage was around 80%, so even though you could record with it, you couldn't really do much else on the system until recording was over. :cry: [/QUOTE]

Verification