home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
Help with HTPC specs
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James" data-source="post: 84705" data-attributes="member: 12681"><p>I must say that in the past I've only brought Samsung HDs, but I looking to get a new one and I was also considering a WD.</p><p></p><p>See here: <a href="http://www.silentpcreview.com/article29-page2.html" target="_blank">http://www.silentpcreview.com/article29-page2.html</a></p><p></p><p>The WD has 16MB cache, to the 8MB on the Samsung. The 250GB models cost the same, a WD 320 = a Samsung 300. The 400GB Samsung is cheaper then the 400 WD. </p><p></p><p>I was thinking about the 320 model, so the WD seems a better buy, but there is not much in it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James, post: 84705, member: 12681"] I must say that in the past I've only brought Samsung HDs, but I looking to get a new one and I was also considering a WD. See here: [url]http://www.silentpcreview.com/article29-page2.html[/url] The WD has 16MB cache, to the 8MB on the Samsung. The 250GB models cost the same, a WD 320 = a Samsung 300. The 400GB Samsung is cheaper then the 400 WD. I was thinking about the 320 model, so the WD seems a better buy, but there is not much in it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
Help with HTPC specs
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
