home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
High-End Video Quality !! (Hardware/Software Recommendations in here)
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jcee" data-source="post: 71736" data-attributes="member: 10506"><p>Though there are lots of threads around dealing with "whats the best gfx card", I thought it would be time to summarize and share the experience. </p><p></p><p>To not compare apples and oranges, I just want to scope the following:</p><p>- High-End video playback (preferrable plasma/lcd connected via YUV or DVI)</p><p>- actual "upper/middle class" gfx boards (e.g. X1***, EN7***, range $80..$200)</p><p></p><p>I want to invite everybody to take part and give his/her experience and recommendation. Please provide meaningful reasons why something is better and compared to what (e.g. opinons like "TV is much better" does not really help). </p><p></p><p>--- To kick-off ...here my thoughts: ---------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>Having tested X1600 and EN7600GS via DVI=>HDMI on a Pio Plasma and used</p><p>the latest drivers. Codecs: Nvidia Purevideo.</p><p></p><p>Generell: </p><p>--------</p><p>Attention! BIOS/DOS support for DVI is not implemented on all boards. Especially my ATI card did display a picture on my digital panel in DOS (so I could configure the BIOS), where the Nvidia wont dispplay anything until windows drivers are loaded.</p><p>(Though you could plug out DVI and plug in svideo on boot, so you could get a display with Nvidia as a workaround)</p><p></p><p>Both cards did allow overscan compensation, Nvidia drivers seem to allow more costumization in regard to timings and calibration, but driver is missing a purevideo tab, so nothing to configure there. </p><p></p><p>(ATI drivers (CCC) seem to be overloaded in terms of funky buttons, like Nvidia more..)</p><p></p><p>Desktop quality:</p><p>--------</p><p>ATI looks somehow too sharp, readability of small fonts is worse than with Nvidia (though having enabled Cleartype, which helped alot). See rainbow colours at the edges of small details (like fonts)</p><p>Nvidia does look better, lot less rainbow effects, nevertheless not missing any sharpness. </p><p></p><p>Video quality</p><p>------------</p><p>Both seem to fine. Have read that AVIVO should have become better with actual drivers since reviews in October 2005, also it was mentioned that AVIVO scores much more points in HQV benchmark. I cannot understand why?!?! </p><p>For me the combination of Nvidia+Purevideo looks better: Small details do have a little more sharpening compared to AVIVO.</p><p></p><p>CPU load</p><p>--------</p><p>No data available. Some people report that ATI/AVIVO gives less CPU usage than Nividia/purevideo. Can someone comment?</p><p></p><p></p><p>others:</p><p>-------</p><p>Someone reported that using ffdsow will stop hardware acceleration from working. (Right? Any comments?)</p><p>If this is true, this might be an important point: For me no combination (ATI/Nvidia/codecs) does perform better than using ffdshow for post- sharpening: The picture gets much clearer and crispier.</p><p></p><p>Recommendation: </p><p>-----------------</p><p>No technical vote for ATI or Nivida, its up to your personal taste. But recommend to use ffdshow. </p><p>Personal opinion: Though AVIVO and Purevideo state that they give superior video quality they do not (yet) make ffdshow obsolet..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jcee, post: 71736, member: 10506"] Though there are lots of threads around dealing with "whats the best gfx card", I thought it would be time to summarize and share the experience. To not compare apples and oranges, I just want to scope the following: - High-End video playback (preferrable plasma/lcd connected via YUV or DVI) - actual "upper/middle class" gfx boards (e.g. X1***, EN7***, range $80..$200) I want to invite everybody to take part and give his/her experience and recommendation. Please provide meaningful reasons why something is better and compared to what (e.g. opinons like "TV is much better" does not really help). --- To kick-off ...here my thoughts: --------------------------------------- Having tested X1600 and EN7600GS via DVI=>HDMI on a Pio Plasma and used the latest drivers. Codecs: Nvidia Purevideo. Generell: -------- Attention! BIOS/DOS support for DVI is not implemented on all boards. Especially my ATI card did display a picture on my digital panel in DOS (so I could configure the BIOS), where the Nvidia wont dispplay anything until windows drivers are loaded. (Though you could plug out DVI and plug in svideo on boot, so you could get a display with Nvidia as a workaround) Both cards did allow overscan compensation, Nvidia drivers seem to allow more costumization in regard to timings and calibration, but driver is missing a purevideo tab, so nothing to configure there. (ATI drivers (CCC) seem to be overloaded in terms of funky buttons, like Nvidia more..) Desktop quality: -------- ATI looks somehow too sharp, readability of small fonts is worse than with Nvidia (though having enabled Cleartype, which helped alot). See rainbow colours at the edges of small details (like fonts) Nvidia does look better, lot less rainbow effects, nevertheless not missing any sharpness. Video quality ------------ Both seem to fine. Have read that AVIVO should have become better with actual drivers since reviews in October 2005, also it was mentioned that AVIVO scores much more points in HQV benchmark. I cannot understand why?!?! For me the combination of Nvidia+Purevideo looks better: Small details do have a little more sharpening compared to AVIVO. CPU load -------- No data available. Some people report that ATI/AVIVO gives less CPU usage than Nividia/purevideo. Can someone comment? others: ------- Someone reported that using ffdsow will stop hardware acceleration from working. (Right? Any comments?) If this is true, this might be an important point: For me no combination (ATI/Nvidia/codecs) does perform better than using ffdshow for post- sharpening: The picture gets much clearer and crispier. Recommendation: ----------------- No technical vote for ATI or Nivida, its up to your personal taste. But recommend to use ffdshow. Personal opinion: Though AVIVO and Purevideo state that they give superior video quality they do not (yet) make ffdshow obsolet.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
General
High-End Video Quality !! (Hardware/Software Recommendations in here)
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
