Branched from off topic post in thread: https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/...ame-database-system.103539/page-8#post-950265
Is there a easy way to see movie series online? Or do you do 'n manual search (like I'm doing) on IMDb? (You can't really be so up to date with the movie series by just casually browsing the IMDb's "Newest Entries" list?)
Dammit! I was wondering if it's already coming from the original script list, but the naming was kind of "off" by the trend I was seeing, being:
{series name} {numeral}[:{chapter heading if any}]
The "Mission: Impossible IV - Ghost Protocol" threw me off. But I'm not interested in renaming the wheel, I just want my movie series to be grouped.
The "custom" script is only a freaking nice way to get my movie collection "fixed" NOW! Rather than waiting for updates.
So I love this idea, vertical scrolling sucks in long names, but I don't want to have everything shortened in the list.
PS. Why are you "waiting" for the Moving Pictures Titan skin? I'm on 1.3.0 Beta with Titan, MovingPictures is not complaining of missing skin files (like IMBD+ is, *cough*) so is this not the "official" Titan skin then for MoPic?
PPS. I have to switch to the default skin to be able to access the IMDb+ settings in the GUI, is this correct or should it be working in Titan already? (So I should be looking at a fixing my broken setup)[DOUBLEPOST=1356950159][/DOUBLEPOST]
Just as I said, a very elaborate system! So please "crit" my suggestions (which I will post the complete list in the other thread when I'm done). Because I did not check on all these things...
(Classic) just sound like you give credit to the guys that newer generations has learned from... so this would be a nice pick (thought I will only ever see it ) I would think the 2.8 rating is low because it is before the time of IMDb, and no one is interested in old movies if there is such a great variety of new ones! It may have been a great movie in it's time, for what was available.
That is exactly why I'm so excited that the rename list is local and not run through an online Db. If a movie makes this list, it is worth watching. Especially if they make 4 or more sequels. If I can only find the time to watch them all!
Infact I found a 5th Home Alone movie as well that I added when verifying them real quick.
Is there a easy way to see movie series online? Or do you do 'n manual search (like I'm doing) on IMDb? (You can't really be so up to date with the movie series by just casually browsing the IMDb's "Newest Entries" list?)
But your last addition is already in the default one as per:
Code:<rename id="tt0117060" title="Mission: Impossible I" /> <rename id="tt0120755" title="Mission: Impossible II" /> <rename id="tt0317919" title="Mission: Impossible III" /> <rename id="tt1229238" title="Mission: Impossible IV - Ghost Protocol" /> <rename id="tt2381249" title="Mission: Impossible V" />
Now you might prefer your naming scheme, but that is why there is the "Rename dBase IMDb+ Scraper (Custom).xml" option for you to go wild with
The 'first' movie is what mainly decide the naming scheme for me, and they call it "Mission: Impossible" for that one.
Dammit! I was wondering if it's already coming from the original script list, but the naming was kind of "off" by the trend I was seeing, being:
{series name} {numeral}[:{chapter heading if any}]
The "Mission: Impossible IV - Ghost Protocol" threw me off. But I'm not interested in renaming the wheel, I just want my movie series to be grouped.
The "custom" script is only a freaking nice way to get my movie collection "fixed" NOW! Rather than waiting for updates.
When I started reading this, I immediately thought, man I don't like acronyms! But it would be helpful for loooong names. And then I realized you've spend a lot of time thinking about this and have already identified my need.I am however working on a new enhancement of IMDb+ that will offer an acronym option for long title movies. For example "Lord of the Rings" becomes "LotR" and this series then uses "M:I". Still playing around with that, because while a long title such as "The Lord of the Rings I: Fellowship of the Ring" benefits from being named "LotR I: Fellowship of the Ring" to mimimize horizontal title scrolling, it is less of an issue on the M:I series. But somebody else might want it for all movie-series titles that actually use acronyms, with M:I being the perfect example.
Right now my idea is to offer an additional option to configure the amount of letters a title has to be before the acronym would then be used (if one exists), with 20 as the default setting. This would then skip M:I by default, but work for LotR, PotC, NoES, CotC, D&D, LC:TR, RotLD, TCoN, and F&tF.
Am kinda awaiting for MovingPictures Titan skin and see how many characters will be reserved for titles before horizontal scrolling is required.
So I love this idea, vertical scrolling sucks in long names, but I don't want to have everything shortened in the list.
PS. Why are you "waiting" for the Moving Pictures Titan skin? I'm on 1.3.0 Beta with Titan, MovingPictures is not complaining of missing skin files (like IMBD+ is, *cough*) so is this not the "official" Titan skin then for MoPic?
PPS. I have to switch to the default skin to be able to access the IMDb+ settings in the GUI, is this correct or should it be working in Titan already? (So I should be looking at a fixing my broken setup)[DOUBLEPOST=1356950159][/DOUBLEPOST]
[DOUBLEPOST=1356951038][/DOUBLEPOST](Both are named "Public Enemies" in MovPic)
I usually go by popularity in IMDb search results, combined with ratings of the movie and a rough idea on what majority of users expect.
In this case the "Public Enemies (2009)" is bound to be in majority of users collection and most will never have the 1996 version in their collection. My preference is then to not let those users even notice anything, so the 2009 version keeps the title as-is. This means the 1996 would cause a conflict and has to be renamed.
Terms I've used are (<country-of-origin>), (TV), (Original), (Classic), (Cult), (Remake), (Reboot), and a few more.
The 2009 version is not a (Remake) of the 1996 one; it is a total new script which also leaves out (Original). I reserve the (Reboot) term for movie-series that are redone from scratch.
So then I prefer to go with (Classic) to indicate it is an older version of the same story. However the very low 2.8 rating does allow usage of (Cult) as well.
Since you are the one who brought up the title conflict, you get to pick; (Classic) or (Cult).
With 1700 entries under your belt you must have a system for almost every case!
It borderlines the insane sometimes indeed, especially when some series get a reboot on the remake. However it is a little bit of effort that goes a long way for a lot of users (almost 30k now if the Google code download counter is accurate). All the rename entries used to be 100% based on my own collection, but that has long since not been the case anymore. Adding series/title-conflicts for other users is still interesting for myself as well, because it sometimes introduces me to new movies or reminds me to dig up an oldie I forgot about.
I usually go by popularity in IMDb search results, combined with ...
Just as I said, a very elaborate system! So please "crit" my suggestions (which I will post the complete list in the other thread when I'm done). Because I did not check on all these things...
The 2009 version is not a (Remake) of the 1996 one; it is a total new script which also leaves out (Original). I reserve the (Reboot) term for movie-series that are redone from scratch.
So then I prefer to go with (Classic) to indicate it is an older version of the same story. However the very low 2.8 rating does allow usage of (Cult) as well.
Since you are the one who brought up the title conflict, you get to pick; (Classic) or (Cult).
(Classic) just sound like you give credit to the guys that newer generations has learned from... so this would be a nice pick (thought I will only ever see it ) I would think the 2.8 rating is low because it is before the time of IMDb, and no one is interested in old movies if there is such a great variety of new ones! It may have been a great movie in it's time, for what was available.
Adding series/title-conflicts for other users is still interesting for myself as well, because it sometimes introduces me to new movies or reminds me to dig up an oldie I forgot about.
That is exactly why I'm so excited that the rename list is local and not run through an online Db. If a movie makes this list, it is worth watching. Especially if they make 4 or more sequels. If I can only find the time to watch them all!
Last edited: