home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
is it time to kiss mediaportal good bye
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ziphnor" data-source="post: 55125" data-attributes="member: 14215"><p>My point is that they cant sue(or shouldnt be able to) you for allowing a user to do something that might be legal in some cases, and illegal other times. It might be that some cable provider doesnt disallow it for example, in which case it should be sufficient that MP pointed out before using the softcam that you should check your terms of agreement.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the Smartcards now a days are so hard to copy that in order to use a seperate smartcard reader you would need at least one working original smartcard anyway, so how is it more illegal than say the SmartWi cardsplitter i am using?</p><p></p><p>Note that a widespread program like MyTheatre which supports havent been sued yet. I think the MP team is being overly cautious and i hate it when lawyers manage to make some illegal by using scare tactics.</p><p></p><p>Finally just supporting the MDAPI doesnt even require MP to integrate Softcam support, it would have the nature of a plugin and you could just choose not to distribute it along with MP. MediaPortal can hardly be held responsible for the plugins people load into their own MP! No-one has sued Microsoft over people making illegal programs for windows, right?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then what is this (live and open) thread (in the dev forum) about?:</p><p><a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/viewtopic.php?t=13057" target="_blank">https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/viewtopic.php?t=13057</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ziphnor, post: 55125, member: 14215"] My point is that they cant sue(or shouldnt be able to) you for allowing a user to do something that might be legal in some cases, and illegal other times. It might be that some cable provider doesnt disallow it for example, in which case it should be sufficient that MP pointed out before using the softcam that you should check your terms of agreement. Anyway, the Smartcards now a days are so hard to copy that in order to use a seperate smartcard reader you would need at least one working original smartcard anyway, so how is it more illegal than say the SmartWi cardsplitter i am using? Note that a widespread program like MyTheatre which supports havent been sued yet. I think the MP team is being overly cautious and i hate it when lawyers manage to make some illegal by using scare tactics. Finally just supporting the MDAPI doesnt even require MP to integrate Softcam support, it would have the nature of a plugin and you could just choose not to distribute it along with MP. MediaPortal can hardly be held responsible for the plugins people load into their own MP! No-one has sued Microsoft over people making illegal programs for windows, right? Then what is this (live and open) thread (in the dev forum) about?: [url]https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/viewtopic.php?t=13057[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
is it time to kiss mediaportal good bye
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom