home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Is this the right approach ?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pastimer" data-source="post: 164419" data-attributes="member: 20559"><p>So when i want web radio scheduled but am not in need for tv i still must use TVserver to have the scheduler? Or develop another for MP? And then end up with two scheduling plugins when i want TV as well? That wás an example! Timeshifting is another. Isn't that just the pause button? That push on the pause button is early enough to start a timeshift file. Of course you cannot go back, it's not a recording! So what's the point of timeshifting in TVserver? Beats me!</p><p>Let's turn the question around: What are the benifits of having a fat and slow TVserver instead of having just Mediaportal with a fast lan dvb source? </p><p>Just Mediaportal with the speedy (like Altdvb, channelswitches are INSTANT!) networked dvbsource looks pretty ideal to me. </p><p>Right now, you get the impression that TVserver is IN COMPETITION with MP (see the comparison table as an example of that) instead of being a means to enrich MP.</p><p>The more i think about it, the more i am convinced that the whole idea behind TVserver has gone way out of hand. Too complicated, too slow, too much elements not working, too many bugs. </p><p></p><p>And it is sad that MP users who dont want all the features of TVserver cannot define a networked dvbsource that operates as if it were in your computer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pastimer, post: 164419, member: 20559"] So when i want web radio scheduled but am not in need for tv i still must use TVserver to have the scheduler? Or develop another for MP? And then end up with two scheduling plugins when i want TV as well? That wás an example! Timeshifting is another. Isn't that just the pause button? That push on the pause button is early enough to start a timeshift file. Of course you cannot go back, it's not a recording! So what's the point of timeshifting in TVserver? Beats me! Let's turn the question around: What are the benifits of having a fat and slow TVserver instead of having just Mediaportal with a fast lan dvb source? Just Mediaportal with the speedy (like Altdvb, channelswitches are INSTANT!) networked dvbsource looks pretty ideal to me. Right now, you get the impression that TVserver is IN COMPETITION with MP (see the comparison table as an example of that) instead of being a means to enrich MP. The more i think about it, the more i am convinced that the whole idea behind TVserver has gone way out of hand. Too complicated, too slow, too much elements not working, too many bugs. And it is sad that MP users who dont want all the features of TVserver cannot define a networked dvbsource that operates as if it were in your computer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Is this the right approach ?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom