home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Is this the right approach ?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Laban" data-source="post: 164432" data-attributes="member: 53075"><p>Why not ? What i'm proposing is a MediaServer which then contains plugins. So if you don't want TV, well, don't add that plugin. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would you need two scheduling plugins ? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All recordings in one place = accessability. Easier to do backups. "Intelligent" scheduling of limited resources like f.e tv cards. All scheduling logic in one place instead of duplicated among different clients. </p><p></p><p>Fat & slow ? Well, dual-core 2+GHz CPU's are available for close to nothing these days. And if you think that it's too slow, do a master , slave server setup, put your music on one server, tv on the other and so forth.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's still a beta though. And i didn't see any major problems with the speed compared to MP. Switching channels takes ages for me but it's the same in MP. CAM related problem. I don't see why channel switching should take that much longer when in a single-seat setup. </p><p></p><p>And adding more services won't necessarily add complexity either. Just make them separate plugins/services within the MediaServer service</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Laban, post: 164432, member: 53075"] Why not ? What i'm proposing is a MediaServer which then contains plugins. So if you don't want TV, well, don't add that plugin. Why would you need two scheduling plugins ? All recordings in one place = accessability. Easier to do backups. "Intelligent" scheduling of limited resources like f.e tv cards. All scheduling logic in one place instead of duplicated among different clients. Fat & slow ? Well, dual-core 2+GHz CPU's are available for close to nothing these days. And if you think that it's too slow, do a master , slave server setup, put your music on one server, tv on the other and so forth. It's still a beta though. And i didn't see any major problems with the speed compared to MP. Switching channels takes ages for me but it's the same in MP. CAM related problem. I don't see why channel switching should take that much longer when in a single-seat setup. And adding more services won't necessarily add complexity either. Just make them separate plugins/services within the MediaServer service [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Is this the right approach ?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom