Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kharasana" data-source="post: 165037" data-attributes="member: 45893">When i read frodo's post from yesterday i thought by myself&nbsp; ..&quot;perfect&quot;... I agree 100%. But frodo's post from today sounds different. My question. What does it make sense to support different clients (MCE etc. ) My opinion is.1. The MediaPortal project has a very good structure.2. The intention to have a server with all components (TV, radio, video, pictures) and thin clients is 100% ok. I think that is all what most of the people want to have at home (of course not computer freeks !). But it will never be possible to write software for USERS an Software freeks. Software freeks don't want to use the software, they want to play with it.3. The GUI is simple. It can be handled by any person.4. The installation procedure is easy.What should be done in the future:1. Reduce the numer of supported TV-cards (the dev's should tell us which tv-cards, graphic cards work best with the software). This makes it easier to get a stable version.2. Don't implement new features, try to make the existing version stable.The only thing i hope is, that you developers don't change your way. Thank you very much for time you spend for this project.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kharasana, post: 165037, member: 45893"] When i read frodo's post from yesterday i thought by myself .."perfect"... I agree 100%. But frodo's post from today sounds different. My question. What does it make sense to support different clients (MCE etc. ) My opinion is. 1. The MediaPortal project has a very good structure. 2. The intention to have a server with all components (TV, radio, video, pictures) and thin clients is 100% ok. I think that is all what most of the people want to have at home (of course not computer freeks !). But it will never be possible to write software for USERS an Software freeks. Software freeks don't want to use the software, they want to play with it. 3. The GUI is simple. It can be handled by any person. 4. The installation procedure is easy. What should be done in the future: 1. Reduce the numer of supported TV-cards (the dev's should tell us which tv-cards, graphic cards work best with the software). This makes it easier to get a stable version. 2. Don't implement new features, try to make the existing version stable. The only thing i hope is, that you developers don't change your way. Thank you very much for time you spend for this project. [/QUOTE]

Verification