home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
madVR Settings thread
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kotik" data-source="post: 1189144" data-attributes="member: 89825"><p>This is a fast and dirty test so don't judge<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Don't mind the % values since they are % valus of current CPU based on the CPU capabilities but they are a rought estimate of whats going on.</p><p></p><p>If u ask me I would say that Deinterlacing is a GPU killer cause the moment I throw deinterlacing to Intel from AMD it saves me around 25% - 30% of GPU load on AMD.</p><p></p><p>If I use Intel for Decoding only it is around 10% off load so still something, I mean we all want to squeeze the most out of our GPU when it comes to madvr, well I think I will take the 10% and try to play with higher dithering <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The screenshot is Decoding and Deinterlacing on Intel, Rendering and Madvr on AMD.</p><p></p><p>My only concern is that Intel deinterlacing is mehh....</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]180206[/ATTACH]</p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="color: #bfbfbf">--- Post updated ---</span></span></p><p>Well i can now use Jinc for both Luma and Chroma but without AR for both.</p><p>Previously i could not go for something like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kotik, post: 1189144, member: 89825"] This is a fast and dirty test so don't judge:) Don't mind the % values since they are % valus of current CPU based on the CPU capabilities but they are a rought estimate of whats going on. If u ask me I would say that Deinterlacing is a GPU killer cause the moment I throw deinterlacing to Intel from AMD it saves me around 25% - 30% of GPU load on AMD. If I use Intel for Decoding only it is around 10% off load so still something, I mean we all want to squeeze the most out of our GPU when it comes to madvr, well I think I will take the 10% and try to play with higher dithering :) The screenshot is Decoding and Deinterlacing on Intel, Rendering and Madvr on AMD. My only concern is that Intel deinterlacing is mehh.... [ATTACH]180206[/ATTACH] [SIZE=2][COLOR=#bfbfbf]--- Post updated ---[/COLOR][/SIZE] Well i can now use Jinc for both Luma and Chroma but without AR for both. Previously i could not go for something like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
madVR Settings thread
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom