Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="daWooky" data-source="post: 1228109" data-attributes="member: 122090">hehe, yep half broken<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />i played a bit with it, it seems to work if i advanced manually once, then on the next change its advancing again.also tried a bit tv zapping, that feels a bit slower but still ok.and nice changes with cpu usage while idle seems much lower now <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="daWooky, post: 1228109, member: 122090"] hehe, yep half broken;) i played a bit with it, it seems to work if i advanced manually once, then on the next change its advancing again. also tried a bit tv zapping, that feels a bit slower but still ok. and nice changes with cpu usage while idle seems much lower now (y)(y) [/QUOTE]

Verification