Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1129704" data-attributes="member: 82144">Thanks for your answer. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Yeah, that domain is complex with a capital C. Waaaay beyond my knowledge/skill.To make it work one would have to implement codec-specific stuff for compatibility... which would take hours upon hours of extremely careful coding and testing. Throw into the mix the fact that codecs can behave differently from version to version... and perhaps the renderer and video/audio format also makes a difference...&lt;shivers&gt;Nasty complex stuff. A bottomless pit for time! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />For my own part I was just curious. The fact that we don't support it doesn't bother me in the slightest.Thanks again for your answer.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1129704, member: 82144"] Thanks for your answer. :) Yeah, that domain is complex with a capital C. [I]Waaaay [/I]beyond my knowledge/skill. To make it work one would have to implement codec-specific stuff for compatibility... which would take hours upon hours of extremely careful coding and testing. Throw into the mix the fact that codecs can behave differently from version to version... and perhaps the renderer and video/audio format also makes a difference... <shivers> Nasty complex stuff. A bottomless pit for time! :) For my own part I was just curious. The fact that we don't support it doesn't bother me in the slightest. Thanks again for your answer. [/QUOTE]

Verification