Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mbuzina" data-source="post: 700418" data-attributes="member: 12382">Smeulf: MP 2 uses uPNP, but at the moment there are no plans to make it standards compliant (there was a discussion a while ago about this, <a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/comments-about-team-mediaportal-news-blogentries-353/mediaportal-2-progress-report-83837/index3.html#post633780" target="_blank">https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/comments-about-team-mediaportal-news-blogentries-353/mediaportal-2-progress-report-83837/index3.html#post633780</a> ). One reason being that the DLNA spec needs to be bought and costs 50 K$ (I remember roughly, so don't nail me on the exact number. But please feel free to donate to the project ;-) ).So DLNA will not be part of the core (at least in the first version(s)). A smart plugin developer could of course create a fitting DLNA server component. And might provide a plugin to bridge the gap to other DLNA servers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mbuzina, post: 700418, member: 12382"] Smeulf: MP 2 uses uPNP, but at the moment there are no plans to make it standards compliant (there was a discussion a while ago about this, [url]https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/comments-about-team-mediaportal-news-blogentries-353/mediaportal-2-progress-report-83837/index3.html#post633780[/url] ). One reason being that the DLNA spec needs to be bought and costs 50 K$ (I remember roughly, so don't nail me on the exact number. But please feel free to donate to the project ;-) ). So DLNA will not be part of the core (at least in the first version(s)). A smart plugin developer could of course create a fitting DLNA server component. And might provide a plugin to bridge the gap to other DLNA servers. [/QUOTE]

Verification