Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vasilich" data-source="post: 1166154" data-attributes="member: 97516">[USER=82144]@mm1352000[/USER] i don't want to use WMI as it takes always too long (we don't want to wait 2 seconds just to get exact version of windows product type, do we?). Moreover, if those Product IDs can be returned from that function, why the descriptions are wrong? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Don't worry, i already corrected descriptions in the code, i just don't have latest version of code here to post it here for testing (gonna do it tonight).It is just sometimes frustrating that documentation on MSDN get half-updated (they have inserted new product types, but haven't updated descriptions for existing ones).P.S. it is also funny that this WMI object they recommend to use is marked as deprecated <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vasilich, post: 1166154, member: 97516"] [USER=82144]@mm1352000[/USER] i don't want to use WMI as it takes always too long (we don't want to wait 2 seconds just to get exact version of windows product type, do we?). Moreover, if those Product IDs can be returned from that function, why the descriptions are wrong? :) Don't worry, i already corrected descriptions in the code, i just don't have latest version of code here to post it here for testing (gonna do it tonight). It is just sometimes frustrating that documentation on MSDN get half-updated (they have inserted new product types, but haven't updated descriptions for existing ones). P.S. it is also funny that this WMI object they recommend to use is marked as deprecated :) [/QUOTE]

Verification