Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fforde" data-source="post: 828789" data-attributes="member: 52082">My comments were not intended to be &quot;barbed&quot; and they were relevant to the original question. And I fully intend to get some of these features included in Moving Pictures proper, as I stated in my original reply. But I manage and am currently the only developer for Moving Pictures (not to mention Pandora MusicBox). I also have a day job and I of course have both family and friends as well. I simply don't have enough time to implement everything I want in Moving Pictures over night. So when I see Rochess working on IMDb+ I am grateful. But at the same time I am a bit frustrated because I know that because of the way grouping and other features are implemented in IMDb+, I will have to go back and address the same issue in Moving Pictures itself sooner or later.<s>So please spare me the attitude. I was trying to provide information, I wasn't trying to hurt anyone's feelings.</s>EDIT: I could have phrased things better in my first reply though, I can understand why RoChess took offense. It wasn't meant maliciously and I am sorry it came across that way.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fforde, post: 828789, member: 52082"] My comments were not intended to be "barbed" and they were relevant to the original question. And I fully intend to get some of these features included in Moving Pictures proper, as I stated in my original reply. But I manage and am currently the only developer for Moving Pictures (not to mention Pandora MusicBox). I also have a day job and I of course have both family and friends as well. I simply don't have enough time to implement everything I want in Moving Pictures over night. So when I see Rochess working on IMDb+ I am grateful. But at the same time I am a bit frustrated because I know that because of the way grouping and other features are implemented in IMDb+, I will have to go back and address the same issue in Moving Pictures itself sooner or later. [s]So please spare me the attitude. I was trying to provide information, I wasn't trying to hurt anyone's feelings.[/s] EDIT: I could have phrased things better in my first reply though, I can understand why RoChess took offense. It wasn't meant maliciously and I am sorry it came across that way. [/QUOTE]

Verification