I do not want to mess up with people here.
But I have rich experience with building almost three HTPC with lost of hardware software options.
But I experienced soo many problems. First of all, thanks to all the people here trying to help me..
When reading the topics here there was always one question left at the end of the day.
Is it not Windows and the big variation of hardware componente, software versions and drivers, codecs giving us almost all of the problems!?
Most answers here in the forum say: "It is a driver issue.. it is a problem of the codec... flash your bios,.. install patch xyz ... there is a problem in DX, replace DLL by earlier version..."
And when my system does not hibernate it is the fault of a tuner card or driver of that gfx card manufacture..
It does not help me.. The problems do never end...
So isnt a more closed setup more reasonable ?! I have seen and experienced the Apple systems and though they have less ressources and less power they perform smoother... and responsive...
My personal explanation is, because it is a integrated well designed system ... Wouldnt it make sense to build something on top of this?!
A colleague has experienced MP and TVcentral over the last two years and has recently quit in advance to Eyetv... (which has less features), but he was tired of always working on the issues mentioned above..
He now is very(!) pleased and said that he did not had to reboot for over a month now.. and channel switching is still fast and responsive..
Maybe he and I am just too stupid for Windows (though I am working professionally with it at work)..But it cannot all be the users fault..
Wouldnt it make sense to port MP to such a plattform?! Or at least define a reference design!?
I would immediatly by me all hardwware/software and follow all rules that would guarrantee me an uptime of >99%!!!
By the way:
We have a similar situation at work, where we run a highly availabe process control network 365/24 and we run big industrial plants with windows computers..
The only way our software vendors gurantee >99,8% availability is by defining every(!) aspect of the hardware of software with zero tolerance.
They even tell us which software is only allowed on that computer.. they even define on which PCI slot the network card has to placed.. no other!!
I can understand this now..! This makes sense!
With a Windows computer in the living room I have not reached 99% and the WAF is down!!
But I have rich experience with building almost three HTPC with lost of hardware software options.
But I experienced soo many problems. First of all, thanks to all the people here trying to help me..
When reading the topics here there was always one question left at the end of the day.
Is it not Windows and the big variation of hardware componente, software versions and drivers, codecs giving us almost all of the problems!?
Most answers here in the forum say: "It is a driver issue.. it is a problem of the codec... flash your bios,.. install patch xyz ... there is a problem in DX, replace DLL by earlier version..."
And when my system does not hibernate it is the fault of a tuner card or driver of that gfx card manufacture..
It does not help me.. The problems do never end...
So isnt a more closed setup more reasonable ?! I have seen and experienced the Apple systems and though they have less ressources and less power they perform smoother... and responsive...
My personal explanation is, because it is a integrated well designed system ... Wouldnt it make sense to build something on top of this?!
A colleague has experienced MP and TVcentral over the last two years and has recently quit in advance to Eyetv... (which has less features), but he was tired of always working on the issues mentioned above..
He now is very(!) pleased and said that he did not had to reboot for over a month now.. and channel switching is still fast and responsive..
Maybe he and I am just too stupid for Windows (though I am working professionally with it at work)..But it cannot all be the users fault..
Wouldnt it make sense to port MP to such a plattform?! Or at least define a reference design!?
I would immediatly by me all hardwware/software and follow all rules that would guarrantee me an uptime of >99%!!!
By the way:
We have a similar situation at work, where we run a highly availabe process control network 365/24 and we run big industrial plants with windows computers..
The only way our software vendors gurantee >99,8% availability is by defining every(!) aspect of the hardware of software with zero tolerance.
They even tell us which software is only allowed on that computer.. they even define on which PCI slot the network card has to placed.. no other!!
I can understand this now..! This makes sense!
With a Windows computer in the living room I have not reached 99% and the WAF is down!!
England