home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
MP recording or 4TR: pros and cons?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kkendall" data-source="post: 363950" data-attributes="member: 49885"><p>Ok, so the 4TR(GUI) part is open-source and can be used to integrate into MP but the main program/system is closed, so you're not able to integrate the system behind it into MP. When all code is released it will be possible to integrate it into MP, right? </p><p>So if everybody agrees it is a big improvement to the standard recording part of MP (I haven't seen any arguments that would make one prefer the standard recording part), why don't the devs start a dialogue with dvdfreak to see what can be done to integrate this into MP, have it as a standard active plugin, give it a prominent place in the forum like in Hot Plugins, or something like that. </p><p></p><p>That would serve the whole MP community, it would give MP more advantages over other htpc software and it would wash away quite a lot of bug that are in the recording section right now. And most of the programming work has already been done by dvdfreak, so I'd say welcome him to the dev team and let him take care of that part of MP. </p><p>Just giving some possible suggestions <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>If I was a dev for MP, I know what I would do <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> I'd swallow my pride and see how I can replace my work for something better. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I definately will <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p>But I would really like to seen MP improve as a whole for everybody, not just the few that find 4TR after searching for it on the forum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kkendall, post: 363950, member: 49885"] Ok, so the 4TR(GUI) part is open-source and can be used to integrate into MP but the main program/system is closed, so you're not able to integrate the system behind it into MP. When all code is released it will be possible to integrate it into MP, right? So if everybody agrees it is a big improvement to the standard recording part of MP (I haven't seen any arguments that would make one prefer the standard recording part), why don't the devs start a dialogue with dvdfreak to see what can be done to integrate this into MP, have it as a standard active plugin, give it a prominent place in the forum like in Hot Plugins, or something like that. That would serve the whole MP community, it would give MP more advantages over other htpc software and it would wash away quite a lot of bug that are in the recording section right now. And most of the programming work has already been done by dvdfreak, so I'd say welcome him to the dev team and let him take care of that part of MP. Just giving some possible suggestions :) If I was a dev for MP, I know what I would do :D I'd swallow my pride and see how I can replace my work for something better. :) I definately will :) But I would really like to seen MP improve as a whole for everybody, not just the few that find 4TR after searching for it on the forum. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
MP recording or 4TR: pros and cons?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
