Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="karniemi" data-source="post: 1159221" data-attributes="member: 108262">I had totally missed that there was another reply on this thread.Thanks for such a complete answer, mm. I got the picture. Just debating further...if Mp would start recording when the forthcoming 15s contains scheduled recordings, it could basically start on time.&nbsp; Of course, stopping should be still done only when the end-time was actually passed. But, I do understand this would add a seek-ahead step in the logic - quite a simple thing to implement probably, but of course, each additional step makes it more complicated.For commercial channels this has been no problem...they usually start broadcasts late anyway. But the tax-paid channels start usually on spot - and I noticed to have some incomplete recordings.I can live with it ...now that I know to never set pre-record time to &quot;0&quot;. I did set that when I noticed that all of my recordings had started way too early.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="karniemi, post: 1159221, member: 108262"] I had totally missed that there was another reply on this thread. Thanks for such a complete answer, mm. I got the picture. Just debating further...if Mp would start recording when the forthcoming 15s contains scheduled recordings, it could basically start on time. Of course, stopping should be still done only when the end-time was actually passed. But, I do understand this would add a seek-ahead step in the logic - quite a simple thing to implement probably, but of course, each additional step makes it more complicated. For commercial channels this has been no problem...they usually start broadcasts late anyway. But the tax-paid channels start usually on spot - and I noticed to have some incomplete recordings. I can live with it ...now that I know to never set pre-record time to "0". I did set that when I noticed that all of my recordings had started way too early. [/QUOTE]

Verification