Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dadeo" data-source="post: 995550" data-attributes="member: 27204"><p>Can we please wait and see what sa_ddam213 actually needs and what our online repository can provide for him before we start talking about changing it?&nbsp; Do I need to remind&nbsp; you of the 3 years of torture and nightmare we lived through trying to get any developer to work on our old repo?&nbsp; As soon as the repo becomes dependent on some developer, it is very likely we will not find anyone to update it as is proven by history!&nbsp; We have barely managed to get a developer interested to work on MPEM (and as you know few were interested in working on MPEI in spite our our constant requests) so I get really nervous about making our whole Online Repository dependent on getting even more developers interested. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Dadeo, post: 995550, member: 27204"] Can we please wait and see what sa_ddam213 actually needs and what our online repository can provide for him before we start talking about changing it? Do I need to remind you of the 3 years of torture and nightmare we lived through trying to get any developer to work on our old repo? As soon as the repo becomes dependent on some developer, it is very likely we will not find anyone to update it as is proven by history! We have barely managed to get a developer interested to work on MPEM (and as you know few were interested in working on MPEI in spite our our constant requests) so I get really nervous about making our whole Online Repository dependent on getting even more developers interested. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification