home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Needed client specs
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1124299" data-attributes="member: 82144"><p>[USER=117536]@RonD[/USER]</p><p>This is probably stating the obvious, but decoding/displaying 1080i requires more processing power than 720p for 2 reasons:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">More pixels.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The deinterlacing.</li> </ol><p>The first point is obvious; the second point, maybe not so much... but it's critical, because the requirement for deinterlacing - which is quite an intensive process, especially with the nice algorithms - can and does tip hardware over the edge (in terms of the hardware's capability to deliver smooth video).</p><p></p><p>Lots of relatively cheap low end graphics chipsets still seem to target 1080<strong>p</strong> as their baseline spec. That's probably due to the ability to market such a chipset as "full HD capable", "Blu-ray capable" etc. Lots of people buy [cheap, compact] products based on these chipsets, hoping to use them with HTPCs... and are disappointed when they find out that they can't get smooth HD TV playback.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1124299, member: 82144"] [USER=117536]@RonD[/USER] This is probably stating the obvious, but decoding/displaying 1080i requires more processing power than 720p for 2 reasons: [LIST=1] [*]More pixels. [*]The deinterlacing. [/LIST] The first point is obvious; the second point, maybe not so much... but it's critical, because the requirement for deinterlacing - which is quite an intensive process, especially with the nice algorithms - can and does tip hardware over the edge (in terms of the hardware's capability to deliver smooth video). Lots of relatively cheap low end graphics chipsets still seem to target 1080[B]p[/B] as their baseline spec. That's probably due to the ability to market such a chipset as "full HD capable", "Blu-ray capable" etc. Lots of people buy [cheap, compact] products based on these chipsets, hoping to use them with HTPCs... and are disappointed when they find out that they can't get smooth HD TV playback. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Needed client specs
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom