Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Waltz" data-source="post: 45310" data-attributes="member: 10616">I'm using PureVideo as well and are quite happy - image quality is slightly better than with DScaler or InterVideo 4 (at least on my system; it's a GeForce FX 5200 with S-Video-Out and I'm using a simple PAL television set).And the PureVideo decoder solved a very annoying problem I was having with every other MPEG2 codec so far: MPEG2 video playback was always slightly out of sync with the audio; the video was always about 1/10 seconds too slow. Problem gone with PureVideo! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />But reading all the other posts here makes me wonder: Why is PureVideo an alternative to ffdshow? I'm using that as well, but just for AVI decoding (DivX, Xvid...). I didn't know you could use ffdshow as an MPEG2 decoder, too? What do you guys use for AVI decoding?&nbsp;- Waltz</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Waltz, post: 45310, member: 10616"] I'm using PureVideo as well and are quite happy - image quality is slightly better than with DScaler or InterVideo 4 (at least on my system; it's a GeForce FX 5200 with S-Video-Out and I'm using a simple PAL television set). And the PureVideo decoder solved a very annoying problem I was having with every other MPEG2 codec so far: MPEG2 video playback was always slightly out of sync with the audio; the video was always about 1/10 seconds too slow. Problem gone with PureVideo! :) But reading all the other posts here makes me wonder: Why is PureVideo an alternative to ffdshow? I'm using that as well, but just for AVI decoding (DivX, Xvid...). I didn't know you could use ffdshow as an MPEG2 decoder, too? What do you guys use for AVI decoding? - Waltz [/QUOTE]

Verification