Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="lulsam" data-source="post: 138685" data-attributes="member: 28181">Good, I am not alone in the universe!!!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> Actually I don't think 100% of the issue is because smb protocol, although I fully agree on ftp or http have less overhead. Just check this: how much time does it take to list the directories / files in regular windows explorer? For me it takes less that 1/10 than with MP!!!!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> . Check several mode views like thumbnails, icons, list and details to better understand how fast is your setup without MP working, and then you can determine how much delay is introducing MP by itself.Probably there are some strategies that could be implemented to speed up the directory / file listing, but the MP developers has to chose the best one (I am not a .NET developer).While somebody solves it, I share the workarrounds I did to optimize the directory listing:1.- Re-order the directories (grouping them by years). Right now my longer subdirectory list has 28 elements, and MP displays it at aceptable speed2.- Deleted any folder.jpg file to decrease network traffic (surprisingly this files are not locally cached) and time to loadRegards</blockquote>

[QUOTE="lulsam, post: 138685, member: 28181"] Good, I am not alone in the universe!!!:D Actually I don't think 100% of the issue is because smb protocol, although I fully agree on ftp or http have less overhead. Just check this: how much time does it take to list the directories / files in regular windows explorer? For me it takes less that 1/10 than with MP!!!!:( . Check several mode views like thumbnails, icons, list and details to better understand how fast is your setup without MP working, and then you can determine how much delay is introducing MP by itself. Probably there are some strategies that could be implemented to speed up the directory / file listing, but the MP developers has to chose the best one (I am not a .NET developer). While somebody solves it, I share the workarrounds I did to optimize the directory listing: 1.- Re-order the directories (grouping them by years). Right now my longer subdirectory list has 28 elements, and MP displays it at aceptable speed 2.- Deleted any folder.jpg file to decrease network traffic (surprisingly this files are not locally cached) and time to load Regards [/QUOTE]

Verification