home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Picture quality from HTPCs in general
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gxtracker" data-source="post: 283630" data-attributes="member: 14004"><p>I believe FFDshow sets the interlaced flag for all content, regardless of whether or not the source video is interlaced content or not.</p><p></p><p>Realisticly, it shouldn't compromise picture quality at all, since on a progressive image, there is no alternate field to de-interlace.</p><p></p><p>I have no problems playing progressive or interlaced content with the option set.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>While I agree that it causes a huge headache for progressive scan outputing devices, Interlaced footage does have its place. Sporting events and any live-action video looks much smoother with a refresh rate of 60Hz compared to progressive content at 30Hz - at least here in North America anyways. I find a lot of times HD channels are compressed differently depending on the channel, and the service provider you have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gxtracker, post: 283630, member: 14004"] I believe FFDshow sets the interlaced flag for all content, regardless of whether or not the source video is interlaced content or not. Realisticly, it shouldn't compromise picture quality at all, since on a progressive image, there is no alternate field to de-interlace. I have no problems playing progressive or interlaced content with the option set. While I agree that it causes a huge headache for progressive scan outputing devices, Interlaced footage does have its place. Sporting events and any live-action video looks much smoother with a refresh rate of 60Hz compared to progressive content at 30Hz - at least here in North America anyways. I find a lot of times HD channels are compressed differently depending on the channel, and the service provider you have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Picture quality from HTPCs in general
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
