home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Picture quality MP1.0 vs DVBviewer
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 363466" data-attributes="member: 10858"><p>When comparing side to side those screen shots (they contain only small difference) I think the MP one looks better (just an opinion).</p><p></p><p>Looks like DVB viewer has more smoothing, especially if you look at the text at the bottom of the screen. </p><p></p><p>It's pretty easy to see that the DVBViewer shoot (or MP in that case you have made a test where the file names are switched on purpose <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />) </p><p></p><p>1) Open both pictures in Paint (in fullscreen)</p><p>2) Zoom to 800%</p><p>3) Scroll down to right bottom corner</p><p>4) Compare details on "1" char</p><p></p><p>That same "sharpness" (not sure if we can call it sharpness on MPEG SD video <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />) will make MP look to have more decoding artifacts as not much smoothing is applied to the whole image.</p><p></p><p>...now, I'm not sure where the difference in "blur" level comes, but its not any deinterlace error I would assume, but instead something else.</p><p></p><p>PS. I definitely wouldn't loose my sleep because of that difference as you can see the picture quality itself is horrible on that sample .ts <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Just check how much mpeg blocking artifacts there are visible, those are much more visible than the slight smoothing difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 363466, member: 10858"] When comparing side to side those screen shots (they contain only small difference) I think the MP one looks better (just an opinion). Looks like DVB viewer has more smoothing, especially if you look at the text at the bottom of the screen. It's pretty easy to see that the DVBViewer shoot (or MP in that case you have made a test where the file names are switched on purpose :)) 1) Open both pictures in Paint (in fullscreen) 2) Zoom to 800% 3) Scroll down to right bottom corner 4) Compare details on "1" char That same "sharpness" (not sure if we can call it sharpness on MPEG SD video :)) will make MP look to have more decoding artifacts as not much smoothing is applied to the whole image. ...now, I'm not sure where the difference in "blur" level comes, but its not any deinterlace error I would assume, but instead something else. PS. I definitely wouldn't loose my sleep because of that difference as you can see the picture quality itself is horrible on that sample .ts :) Just check how much mpeg blocking artifacts there are visible, those are much more visible than the slight smoothing difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Picture quality MP1.0 vs DVBviewer
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom