Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MageMinds" data-source="post: 669672" data-attributes="member: 30288">I suspect that those files uses evey trick in the x264 book to make it look &quot;good&quot; for that size...Man I would get the XviD before getting a 720p of 1h40 of 500 MB. My 720p movies are at least 4GB file size. Usenet is my friend man!Anyways, those trick in the book makes some codec to drop frames, codec maker doesn't integrate every little details of x264. Also SAF is not a codec, it's a codec pack ... I assume you're using ffdshow to decode your x264, IMO the worst possible codec to choose... Get your hand on CoreAVC for 10$ and you might get lucky and it will be able to decode those crappy files.There's no way I'm gonna download that, I fear my computer will hate me if I do... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Not mentioning that this site also looks like a virus nest...Good luck!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MageMinds, post: 669672, member: 30288"] I suspect that those files uses evey trick in the x264 book to make it look "good" for that size... Man I would get the XviD before getting a 720p of 1h40 of 500 MB. My 720p movies are at least 4GB file size. Usenet is my friend man! Anyways, those trick in the book makes some codec to drop frames, codec maker doesn't integrate every little details of x264. Also SAF is not a codec, it's a codec pack ... I assume you're using ffdshow to decode your x264, IMO the worst possible codec to choose... Get your hand on CoreAVC for 10$ and you might get lucky and it will be able to decode those crappy files. There's no way I'm gonna download that, I fear my computer will hate me if I do... :-) Not mentioning that this site also looks like a virus nest... Good luck! [/QUOTE]

Verification