home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
QAM Support for US ATSC tuners
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IcePickrg" data-source="post: 200270" data-attributes="member: 47745"><p><strong>Channel number Standard? HA!</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup, the Major Channel + Minor channel for a channel number is what I've seen used in OTA ATSC. From what I have seen the minor channels are "sub" channels of major, and not a different provider all together.</p><p></p><p>IN QAM, the Major & Minors are a complete mix of different providers</p><p></p><p>It is getting messy because I have A provider on channel "9" on cable and OTA analog... and the same provider is 9-1 or "91" on ATSC OTA, but "91" is a analog cable channel - CSPAN. Start adding in Satellites, and its NA channel number soup.</p><p></p><p>Because they don't stick to a standard, it would be beneficial to create a tunningdetail.physchannel this way, adjustments can be made freely to tuningdetails.channelnumber depending on personal preferences and how the provider assigns to channelnumber.</p><p></p><p>It is ok to have the same channel number in tunningdetail.channelnumber on different channels. It seems that TVServer picks this up as the same channel, in which case the preferred card takes precedence! Awesome!</p><p></p><p>May I suggest the tunningdetail.physchannel db change?</p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IcePickrg, post: 200270, member: 47745"] [b]Channel number Standard? HA![/b] Yup, the Major Channel + Minor channel for a channel number is what I've seen used in OTA ATSC. From what I have seen the minor channels are "sub" channels of major, and not a different provider all together. IN QAM, the Major & Minors are a complete mix of different providers It is getting messy because I have A provider on channel "9" on cable and OTA analog... and the same provider is 9-1 or "91" on ATSC OTA, but "91" is a analog cable channel - CSPAN. Start adding in Satellites, and its NA channel number soup. Because they don't stick to a standard, it would be beneficial to create a tunningdetail.physchannel this way, adjustments can be made freely to tuningdetails.channelnumber depending on personal preferences and how the provider assigns to channelnumber. It is ok to have the same channel number in tunningdetail.channelnumber on different channels. It seems that TVServer picks this up as the same channel, in which case the preferred card takes precedence! Awesome! May I suggest the tunningdetail.physchannel db change? :thx: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
QAM Support for US ATSC tuners
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom