home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Question about the flexibility of filenames.
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lehmden" data-source="post: 1236219" data-attributes="member: 109222"><p>Hi.</p><p></p><p>The container has nothing to do with the file size aside of a very few bytes. And here MKV is slightly smaller than MP4. </p><p>The file size only depends on the used codecs and bitrate and the number of tracks (video, audio, subtitle, chapters,...) inside the video file but in no way on the used container (file extension).</p><p></p><p>There also is a codec named MP4 (aka DivX, XVid, h263) but this is a very old and un- efficient one. More recent are AVC (also named h264) and HEVC (aka h265). H265 is relatively new and needs lots of hardware power. Aside this it is very expensive for everyone providing hardware and content encoded in h265. So most likely h265 will not live that long... As a good compromise today you best use h264...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lehmden, post: 1236219, member: 109222"] Hi. The container has nothing to do with the file size aside of a very few bytes. And here MKV is slightly smaller than MP4. The file size only depends on the used codecs and bitrate and the number of tracks (video, audio, subtitle, chapters,...) inside the video file but in no way on the used container (file extension). There also is a codec named MP4 (aka DivX, XVid, h263) but this is a very old and un- efficient one. More recent are AVC (also named h264) and HEVC (aka h265). H265 is relatively new and needs lots of hardware power. Aside this it is very expensive for everyone providing hardware and content encoded in h265. So most likely h265 will not live that long... As a good compromise today you best use h264... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
Question about the flexibility of filenames.
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
