Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MacGyver2k" data-source="post: 735525" data-attributes="member: 15878">I'm using the Dataram RamDisk under W764 for Mediaporta 1.2.0 alpha, and it's working fine.I'm on multiseat with 2 DVB-C Cards, but only one client.My Ramdisk is 2GB, with a Filesize of 486MB and 3min/3max files.1458MB for Files + 486MB for Overhead gives 1944MB Total Size.That gives me about 14min in HD or 40min in SD as timeshift buffer, which is enough for me.So what are the benefits of more files?I'm using NTFS, but tried FAT32 before. Haven't noticed a difference, but if i remember correctly someone on the forum wrote ntfs would be better for file allocation or so.And fyi: If you use the dataram ramdisk make sure you use the image load feature at startup. that ensures the ramdisk alsways uses the given drivelettee, without the loading feature windows assigns always the first free driveletter (which could result in differen drive letters if you are using removable drives/truecrypt volumes aswell).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MacGyver2k, post: 735525, member: 15878"] I'm using the Dataram RamDisk under W764 for Mediaporta 1.2.0 alpha, and it's working fine. I'm on multiseat with 2 DVB-C Cards, but only one client. My Ramdisk is 2GB, with a Filesize of 486MB and 3min/3max files. 1458MB for Files + 486MB for Overhead gives 1944MB Total Size. That gives me about 14min in HD or 40min in SD as timeshift buffer, which is enough for me. So what are the benefits of more files? I'm using NTFS, but tried FAT32 before. Haven't noticed a difference, but if i remember correctly someone on the forum wrote ntfs would be better for file allocation or so. And fyi: If you use the dataram ramdisk make sure you use the image load feature at startup. that ensures the ramdisk alsways uses the given drivelettee, without the loading feature windows assigns always the first free driveletter (which could result in differen drive letters if you are using removable drives/truecrypt volumes aswell). [/QUOTE]

Verification