Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mrspock" data-source="post: 735565" data-attributes="member: 82522">Thanks for your answers. It seems that RAMDisk usage is not good for all the systems... like the one by seco. Hope mine works...Looking at MacGyver2k configuration, my first option should work. Everybody agree?I've read somewhere that more files (smaller files) are better. The reason was that overhead will be smaller, allowing more buffer for the timeshift. In your case, you need 0.5Gb for the overhead, so 1.5Gb is for the buffer. With an overhead of 0.1Gb, you would have 1.9Gb for the buffer (10 more minutes). It sounds logical... but I don't know if this is completely true. Any other opinions and configurations would be welcome.Using the image load feature at start up is needed if you want to use NTFS, so it solves also the problem with drive letter. One more question: Dataram says that loading the image could took several minutes... Is it true for your 4Gb image?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mrspock, post: 735565, member: 82522"] Thanks for your answers. It seems that RAMDisk usage is not good for all the systems... like the one by seco. Hope mine works... Looking at MacGyver2k configuration, my first option should work. Everybody agree? I've read somewhere that more files (smaller files) are better. The reason was that overhead will be smaller, allowing more buffer for the timeshift. In your case, you need 0.5Gb for the overhead, so 1.5Gb is for the buffer. With an overhead of 0.1Gb, you would have 1.9Gb for the buffer (10 more minutes). It sounds logical... but I don't know if this is completely true. Any other opinions and configurations would be welcome. Using the image load feature at start up is needed if you want to use NTFS, so it solves also the problem with drive letter. One more question: Dataram says that loading the image could took several minutes... Is it true for your 4Gb image? [/QUOTE]

Verification