Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="michael_t" data-source="post: 972311" data-attributes="member: 85139">The main section &quot;TV&quot; contains lots of tv only settings, so &quot;TV / Radio&quot; might be misleading. But I am not happy about this, too and I would be thankful for good ideas how to rearrange the tv and radio settings better on the sections.If someone (who is it now? - I lost the track on all these discussions<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />) decides to put it on the roadmap...Seriously: This change contains a change (addition of one method) to the IController interface. I think that this is no problem (not even for downwards compatibility) since this interface is only used for one reason - to implement the TvController of the TV Service which is used for remotely calling its methods. Thus an additional method cannot harm - if the client knows and uses it, it's ok and if it does not know of it, it won't miss it. But I think some more experienced people should hav a look at this code, if it is safe before scheduling it for a version.&nbsp;Michael</blockquote>

[QUOTE="michael_t, post: 972311, member: 85139"] The main section "TV" contains lots of tv only settings, so "TV / Radio" might be misleading. But I am not happy about this, too and I would be thankful for good ideas how to rearrange the tv and radio settings better on the sections. If someone (who is it now? - I lost the track on all these discussions;)) decides to put it on the roadmap... Seriously: This change contains a change (addition of one method) to the IController interface. I think that this is no problem (not even for downwards compatibility) since this interface is only used for one reason - to implement the TvController of the TV Service which is used for remotely calling its methods. Thus an additional method cannot harm - if the client knows and uses it, it's ok and if it does not know of it, it won't miss it. But I think some more experienced people should hav a look at this code, if it is safe before scheduling it for a version. Michael [/QUOTE]

Verification