Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nazgulled" data-source="post: 366054" data-attributes="member: 86572">First, I never said that the way you are saying I said it...Starting or doing something like SAF from scratch takes a lot more time than to simply update a project with such a simple thing.Please, do not put words in my mouth that I didn't say!EDIT:I don't like to be misunderstood so...First, I never said that hoborg should have time to do what I suggested since he only has a family and child to take here while I have university exams. No, I never meant what I said that way... Everyone as responsibilities, no matter what they are, we all of them and they are important to us even if they aren't to someone else. Still, what I said before editing this post is still valid, starting something like SAF from scratch is not the same as updating the project with something that doesn't take that much time.I mean, how much time can it take to simply look for another file, copy it to "system32" and register the same way it is done for "CLVdec.ax"? It's the same thing as for that file, just do it for another one. And, how hard can it be to add an option to select the components we want to install? Unless Paquet Builder is hard to use or doesn't have that option...Either way, what bothered me with hoborg's answer was not the reason itself... I mean, I understand you have a family and all that, like I said, we all have responsibilities, but since you decided to create SAF and make it available to the public you should expect people to comment about it, criticize it (which I didn't), applaud you for it and sometimes even suggest you new features or options, right? That's all I did, a simple suggestion to improve SAF. You either choose to accept or decline my suggestion, never forced you to anything nor I stated you had to do it no matter what.You have your responsibilities, you have your priorities, I respect all that... It's just what you said and the way you said it, it just seemed so mean like "get lost dude, I don't care about your suggestion, do it your self and don't bother me" when I simple requested for something to be added. If you don't have the time for it (no matter the reason) just say so. If you don't like my suggestion because of this and that and are willing to discuss it, I'm all for it and I'll try to make you see my point of view. If after all that you still don't like my suggestion at all, just say so. If you simply don't want to implement it, just say so.What bothered me was not what you said and the fact that you don't want to implement what I suggested, I'm fine with that, it's your project. What bothered me was the way you said it...To finish, congrats for the great idea that SAF is. In my point of view, it could be better, it could have some more filters/decoders with options to select what we want, it could be better built (I'm referring to placing the .ax file in the root C: drive), but this is just me.P.S: Could you provide me with all the project source for SAF? I said I didn't have time and I don't, but I'm really interested in doing something like SAF and wouldn't mind to try and make something in the future. But I can't do it without SAF source as I don't understand somethings you are doing and the way you are doing them and the source would help me with all that.</blockquote>

Verification