Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hulkhaugen" data-source="post: 393895" data-attributes="member: 84392">Well, thanks for a lot of great answers. first off, hoborg;3)If that's the case, then what is the difference between a cheap DVD-player and a expensive DVD-player with upscaling (which also makes the image quality close to HD quality) when the are plugged into a hi-def tv?6) Yep, got 3xHDMI 1.3 inputs, so i use DVI-D-&gt;HDMI (No HDMI output on my HD3650 card).Windows) I see, that sounds like a great feature, but my HTPC isn't that dedicated since i use it for a lot of internet searching, Spotify, Torrents etc (Maybe i should change my habits, or find a way to integrate them to MP?). And no disrespect, but my experience with Vista says that it's more stable, faster and better than XP. I'm no Vista fanboy, i'm more rational than that, but the only thing i miss from XP is that it's way faster when i copy content over the network. Now, my HTPC is rather powerfull though <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />About refreshrates, as far as i can remember, 60Hz is as high as it goes. Darn about the upscaling, i was really looking forward to that. When it comes to my M100 &quot;100Hz technology&quot;, i expected it to be better left off.So, whether or not you guys agree on XP vs Vista, you seem to agree that x86(32bit) is the better choice. Wouldn't mind go back since i had some problems with java, haali and other things in x64 (probably just my stupidness, lol.)Well, thanks for all the good replies guys, really appreciated it.Farvel og på gjensyn <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hulkhaugen, post: 393895, member: 84392"] Well, thanks for a lot of great answers. first off, hoborg; 3)If that's the case, then what is the difference between a cheap DVD-player and a expensive DVD-player with upscaling (which also makes the image quality close to HD quality) when the are plugged into a hi-def tv? 6) Yep, got 3xHDMI 1.3 inputs, so i use DVI-D->HDMI (No HDMI output on my HD3650 card). Windows) I see, that sounds like a great feature, but my HTPC isn't that dedicated since i use it for a lot of internet searching, Spotify, Torrents etc (Maybe i should change my habits, or find a way to integrate them to MP?). And no disrespect, but my experience with Vista says that it's more stable, faster and better than XP. I'm no Vista fanboy, i'm more rational than that, but the only thing i miss from XP is that it's way faster when i copy content over the network. Now, my HTPC is rather powerfull though :D About refreshrates, as far as i can remember, 60Hz is as high as it goes. Darn about the upscaling, i was really looking forward to that. When it comes to my M100 "100Hz technology", i expected it to be better left off. So, whether or not you guys agree on XP vs Vista, you seem to agree that x86(32bit) is the better choice. Wouldn't mind go back since i had some problems with java, haali and other things in x64 (probably just my stupidness, lol.) Well, thanks for all the good replies guys, really appreciated it. Farvel og på gjensyn :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification