home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Codecs, External Players
SAF v4.00 ''stable'' (StandAlone Filters) - DXVA ready (H.264 and VC-1).
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kiwijunglist" data-source="post: 498452" data-attributes="member: 76888"><p>I'm using ATI HD4670 + XP + ATI9.7 (possibly 9.6) + MP1.1 Alpha + SVN from ~2 weeks ago + VMR9 + SAF unlocked. Played a lot of videos and no rendering problems.</p><p></p><p>With regards to FFDShow Audio integration -> <strong>Yes for integration</strong>. I feel it would be better than MPA/Monogram AAC. For some reason I still require AC3Filter post processing otherwise i get some video frames jumping back/forth aka judder without ac3filter. It has the advantage of 5.1 AAC -> SPDIF being done correctly.</p><p></p><p>FFDShow video = <strong>Maybe Integration</strong>, You could use it for select situations. Still should use MPCVideoDec/PDVD9H264 for any HD material (software decoding is too cpu intensive). Mpeg2 / DVD Video could probably be handled by FFDShow with optional upscaling profile set for certain conditions. A lot of people run a lean CPU because of hardware acceleration, so i think SAF should only switch to software decoding in situations that wont put too much cpu strain.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You shouldn't use post processing / resize for non DXVA <strong>HD material</strong>, because the extra processing will make it too cpu intensive. SD fine, HD too cpu intensive?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kiwijunglist, post: 498452, member: 76888"] I'm using ATI HD4670 + XP + ATI9.7 (possibly 9.6) + MP1.1 Alpha + SVN from ~2 weeks ago + VMR9 + SAF unlocked. Played a lot of videos and no rendering problems. With regards to FFDShow Audio integration -> [B]Yes for integration[/B]. I feel it would be better than MPA/Monogram AAC. For some reason I still require AC3Filter post processing otherwise i get some video frames jumping back/forth aka judder without ac3filter. It has the advantage of 5.1 AAC -> SPDIF being done correctly. FFDShow video = [B]Maybe Integration[/B], You could use it for select situations. Still should use MPCVideoDec/PDVD9H264 for any HD material (software decoding is too cpu intensive). Mpeg2 / DVD Video could probably be handled by FFDShow with optional upscaling profile set for certain conditions. A lot of people run a lean CPU because of hardware acceleration, so i think SAF should only switch to software decoding in situations that wont put too much cpu strain. You shouldn't use post processing / resize for non DXVA [b]HD material[/B], because the extra processing will make it too cpu intensive. SD fine, HD too cpu intensive? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Codecs, External Players
SAF v4.00 ''stable'' (StandAlone Filters) - DXVA ready (H.264 and VC-1).
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom