Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="edterbak" data-source="post: 545934" data-attributes="member: 69192">Hi Hoborg, For a while now I am wondering what your view is about updating of MPC filters or ffdshow ones. I see they are frequently updated. Nearly every new version of SAF contains the latest filters. I am not dissaproving / disliking this ofcourse, but I would just like to know more about why you do this.Questions I have sometimes about that are:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Are you keeping track of the changes made to the filters? Bugs fixing you/we are troubled by etc. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Why are you updating them this frequent. &gt; Is a good stable and working filter good enough? </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">What is the benefit you see by updating more frequent?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">How do you handle possible errors reported here which might be related to new (unknow) introduced bugs in the filter. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Do you think it is a good idea to work to one set of filters? This could help the development of MP SVN versions as well. (theory I have about this is that after a new updated MP SVN, SAF needs to be updated often as well. This means 2 changes to a working system simultanious. This could make bug tracking more difficult.... in theory)</li>
</ul>Just to have it said; I am a big fan of your SAF codec package. I am very happy with it. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Well, I'm just interessted in what and how you think about this. Thank you for the time you can spare thinking about this for me <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Kind regards,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="edterbak, post: 545934, member: 69192"] Hi Hoborg, For a while now I am wondering what your view is about updating of MPC filters or ffdshow ones. I see they are frequently updated. Nearly every new version of SAF contains the latest filters. I am not dissaproving / disliking this ofcourse, but I would just like to know more about why you do this. Questions I have sometimes about that are: [LIST] [*]Are you keeping track of the changes made to the filters? Bugs fixing you/we are troubled by etc. [*]Why are you updating them this frequent. > Is a good stable and working filter good enough? [*]What is the benefit you see by updating more frequent? [*]How do you handle possible errors reported here which might be related to new (unknow) introduced bugs in the filter. [*]Do you think it is a good idea to work to one set of filters? This could help the development of MP SVN versions as well. [SIZE="1"](theory I have about this is that after a new updated MP SVN, SAF needs to be updated often as well. This means 2 changes to a working system simultanious. This [I]could[/I] make bug tracking more difficult.... in theory)[/SIZE] [/LIST] Just to have it said; I am a big fan of your SAF codec package. I am very happy with it. :thx: Well, I'm just interessted in what and how you think about this. Thank you for the time you can spare thinking about this for me :) Kind regards, [/QUOTE]

Verification