Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="globaldonkey" data-source="post: 569999" data-attributes="member: 49844">Re: SAF v4.00beta (StandAlone Filters) - DXVA ready (MPEG2, H.264 and VC-1).Hi Hoborg,That probably wasn't the best example I could give. Only the players were moving in the picture. So here are some new ones.&nbsp; With DXVA on, the artefacts of de-interlacing are much worse, and the picture generally looks worse. The stills don't do it justice - it really is noticeable with a moving image.Double checked the graphs were identical in both situations. PDVD9 for video and ffdshow for audio.As per my system spec, this is on an ATI 4670.And interestingly, I don't observe the same problem with h.264 videos. Switching between DXVA and no DXVA for h.264 produces no noticeable picture quality difference. I'm thinking the MPEG 2 acceleration on these ATI cards may not be all that great.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="globaldonkey, post: 569999, member: 49844"] [b]Re: SAF v4.00beta (StandAlone Filters) - DXVA ready (MPEG2, H.264 and VC-1).[/b] Hi Hoborg, That probably wasn't the best example I could give. Only the players were moving in the picture. So here are some new ones. With DXVA on, the artefacts of de-interlacing are much worse, and the picture generally looks worse. The stills don't do it justice - it really is noticeable with a moving image. Double checked the graphs were identical in both situations. PDVD9 for video and ffdshow for audio. As per my system spec, this is on an ATI 4670. And interestingly, I don't observe the same problem with h.264 videos. Switching between DXVA and no DXVA for h.264 produces no noticeable picture quality difference. I'm thinking the MPEG 2 acceleration on these ATI cards may not be all that great. [/QUOTE]

Verification