Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="emphatic" data-source="post: 613350" data-attributes="member: 24365">Do you want to uninstall 4 to install 5 or vice versa? That's the only case I've seen where you need to have the &quot;original version&quot; pack for this to work. Going 4.xx to 4.xx or 5.xx to 5.xx has never been an issue for me (so far). Considering how much configuration you won't need doing yourself when using SAF, having to download a very small file and running it for an uninstall isn't something to complain about, is it? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> Considering this is still in development, it's a good idea to keep the installer file for the version you're currently using. Perhaps the installation guide needs this info though.Btw, Hoborg, should the SAF 4 be updated to use a newer FFDShow than the currently included one, or are all of the subsequent releases of it too buggy?Emph</blockquote>

[QUOTE="emphatic, post: 613350, member: 24365"] Do you want to uninstall 4 to install 5 or vice versa? That's the only case I've seen where you need to have the "original version" pack for this to work. Going 4.xx to 4.xx or 5.xx to 5.xx has never been an issue for me (so far). Considering how much configuration you won't need doing yourself when using SAF, having to download a very small file and running it for an uninstall isn't something to complain about, is it? :P Considering this is still in development, it's a good idea to keep the installer file for the version you're currently using. Perhaps the installation guide needs this info though. Btw, Hoborg, should the SAF 4 be updated to use a newer FFDShow than the currently included one, or are all of the subsequent releases of it too buggy? Emph [/QUOTE]

Verification