home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
WebService and Mobile Access
Self Contained Web Server / Interface
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="j1nx" data-source="post: 201422" data-attributes="member: 13808"><p>Hi, yes i have seen that one. But that one as well use the control as a MP-plugin, which i think will also brake eventually because development of the plugin stops but developing of MP doesn't.</p><p></p><p>The benefits of making it a stand alone application(just like MCEController), will be; (at least that's how i see it)</p><p></p><p>- Sending keystrokes to the foreground application, will not break control if the mp developers change something</p><p>- Sending keystrokes to the foreground application, will make it suitable for external players configurations.</p><p>- Hence you could even use it for different mediacenter software.</p><p>- Sending messages would give the possibility to minimize,maximize, etc..</p><p>- Sending messages gives the possibility to make any application been send to the foreground/background.</p><p>- It can even be used to start applications.</p><p></p><p>But as Big_Kev, got the same ideas, i have confidence in his expertise.</p><p></p><p>I checked out MCE-Controller even further, and as i see it know, we don't even have to change anything. Just provide it with a proper mediaportal commands XML file and it will work. Offcourse the strings still need to been send.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://mcecontroller.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/mcecontroller/v1/Docs/Readme.htm?revision=1.1.1.1" target="_blank">http://mcecontroller.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/mcecontroller/v1/Docs/Readme.htm?revision=1.1.1.1</a></p><p>(This will explain what i'm trying to say)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="j1nx, post: 201422, member: 13808"] Hi, yes i have seen that one. But that one as well use the control as a MP-plugin, which i think will also brake eventually because development of the plugin stops but developing of MP doesn't. The benefits of making it a stand alone application(just like MCEController), will be; (at least that's how i see it) - Sending keystrokes to the foreground application, will not break control if the mp developers change something - Sending keystrokes to the foreground application, will make it suitable for external players configurations. - Hence you could even use it for different mediacenter software. - Sending messages would give the possibility to minimize,maximize, etc.. - Sending messages gives the possibility to make any application been send to the foreground/background. - It can even be used to start applications. But as Big_Kev, got the same ideas, i have confidence in his expertise. I checked out MCE-Controller even further, and as i see it know, we don't even have to change anything. Just provide it with a proper mediaportal commands XML file and it will work. Offcourse the strings still need to been send. [url]http://mcecontroller.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/mcecontroller/v1/Docs/Readme.htm?revision=1.1.1.1[/url] (This will explain what i'm trying to say) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
WebService and Mobile Access
Self Contained Web Server / Interface
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom