Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="risu" data-source="post: 302111" data-attributes="member: 25038">Hi, I don't know how html looks like on current release but that code indeed should report error like that. I posted fix a while ago:I guess that window.opener. is missing from original html-file? I really haven't looked into later releases, I'm still using 3.0.0.7 myself. When I get time I'll check newest version and try see if I can fix some problems on interface. It seems like added features have had few conflicts with my original interface (yeah, some nasty tweaks there which worked just fine with older version).I'm just reading the original replys, and yes, by the time I did new interface, there was lots of text which isn't translated by ~~~, it wasn't simply possible without Kev making changes to the program. Now I could make a list of&nbsp; translatable content if Kev is willing to add parser entries for them&nbsp; (if he hasn't already done that).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="risu, post: 302111, member: 25038"] Hi, I don't know how html looks like on current release but that code indeed should report error like that. I posted fix a while ago: I guess that window.opener. is missing from original html-file? I really haven't looked into later releases, I'm still using 3.0.0.7 myself. When I get time I'll check newest version and try see if I can fix some problems on interface. It seems like added features have had few conflicts with my original interface (yeah, some nasty tweaks there which worked just fine with older version). I'm just reading the original replys, and yes, by the time I did new interface, there was lots of text which isn't translated by ~~~, it wasn't simply possible without Kev making changes to the program. Now I could make a list of translatable content if Kev is willing to add parser entries for them (if he hasn't already done that). [/QUOTE]

Verification