Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="edterbak" data-source="post: 829529" data-attributes="member: 69192">HI. I just stumbled upon this thread. GREAT improvement work here!!!&nbsp; I have a thought about this and would like your opinions on it.MP Skins (custom and standard) are always in development, as is MP itself ofcourse. I am thinking if it is wise to make the settings tab skinnable or not.IDEA: Make this configuration section unskinnable and have the UI look/feel hardcode it into MP itself. Pros: Always a clean / effective / No errors introduced or options excluded due to skin-faults / It makes the skinners life easier. Cons: It doesnt look fancy.... (personally I can live with.)As for why so little replies? I think it is just bad luck up untill now. I look in the development area often, but havent noticed this thread but now....&nbsp; &nbsp; Might be a combination with bad luck and a 'less catchy' title.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="edterbak, post: 829529, member: 69192"] HI. I just stumbled upon this thread. GREAT improvement work here!!! I have a thought about this and would like your opinions on it. MP Skins (custom and standard) are always in development, as is MP itself ofcourse. I am thinking if it is wise to make the settings tab skinnable or not. IDEA: Make this configuration section [U]un[/U]skinnable and have the UI look/feel hardcode it into MP itself. Pros: Always a clean / effective / No errors introduced or options excluded due to skin-faults / It makes the skinners life easier. Cons: It doesnt look fancy.... (personally I can live with.) As for why so little replies? I think it is just bad luck up untill now. I look in the development area often, but havent noticed this thread but now.... Might be a combination with bad luck and a 'less catchy' title. [/QUOTE]

Verification