Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="offbyone" data-source="post: 807014" data-attributes="member: 73415">I had some time to at least check the latest skype kit. Turns out this won't get me far fast - there are no .net classes in there <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> I'd have to start off write a .net wrapper, and then start the whole plugin from scratch since the new API is totally different to the old COM that the current plugins code base is using. It also looked like we would need to write some clever directshow filter (c++) to actually display the video <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> - nothing I want to devote my spare time to.Maybe we should just stay with the current implementation - at least audio only calls work fine with the code I have so far.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="offbyone, post: 807014, member: 73415"] I had some time to at least check the latest skype kit. Turns out this won't get me far fast - there are no .net classes in there :( I'd have to start off write a .net wrapper, and then start the whole plugin from scratch since the new API is totally different to the old COM that the current plugins code base is using. It also looked like we would need to write some clever directshow filter (c++) to actually display the video :( - nothing I want to devote my spare time to. Maybe we should just stay with the current implementation - at least audio only calls work fine with the code I have so far. [/QUOTE]

Verification