Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Isike" data-source="post: 686607" data-attributes="member: 108827">I attached the log file. I did 2 tests:1. Getting the posterview for the XVID collectionStarts:03-Dec-2010 00:41:36 Debug [&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MovieBrowser]: CurrentView: SMALLICON Ends:03-Dec-2010 00:43:39 Debug [&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MovieBrowser]: SelectedMovie changed: 10,000 BC 2. From detail view back to poster view:Starts:03-Dec-2010 00:44:16 Debug [&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MovieBrowser]: CurrentView: SMALLICON Ends:03-Dec-2010 00:46:16 Debug [&nbsp;&nbsp; MovingPicturesGUI]: Publishing Movie Artwork Both cases took about 2 min. This is not &quot;pinging&quot; files only, since the 250 H264 movies are &quot;pinged&quot; in less than 10 seconds.I think these 2 minutes are spent getting the media info from the files, and that takes more time for XVIDs than H264s. This could be done at startup (assynchronuosly) and having it cached after that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Isike, post: 686607, member: 108827"] I attached the log file. I did 2 tests: 1. Getting the posterview for the XVID collection Starts: 03-Dec-2010 00:41:36 Debug [ MovieBrowser]: CurrentView: SMALLICON Ends: 03-Dec-2010 00:43:39 Debug [ MovieBrowser]: SelectedMovie changed: 10,000 BC 2. From detail view back to poster view: Starts: 03-Dec-2010 00:44:16 Debug [ MovieBrowser]: CurrentView: SMALLICON Ends: 03-Dec-2010 00:46:16 Debug [ MovingPicturesGUI]: Publishing Movie Artwork Both cases took about 2 min. This is not "pinging" files only, since the 250 H264 movies are "pinged" in less than 10 seconds. I think these 2 minutes are spent getting the media info from the files, and that takes more time for XVIDs than H264s. This could be done at startup (assynchronuosly) and having it cached after that. [/QUOTE]

Verification