Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Owlsroost" data-source="post: 1255543" data-attributes="member: 83973">I think that's very likely - this post in the old thread I linked to earlier is a pretty good summary of the situation I suspect - <a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/threads/tv-server-conflictsmanager-plugin.128004/#post-1104663" target="_blank">TV Server ConflictsManager plugin</a>Note that the (tuner) card allocation logic does use the concept of 'user' priorities - the 'scheduler thread' (which handles starting and stopping recordings) creates a separate temporary 'user' for each recording, but they are all at the same (very high) priority. Timeshift users are normally at a much lower priority (and will always be kicked off if a tuner is required for a recording). In theory it should be possible to handle the 'recording priority' situation by having the scheduler thread create temporary users with different priorities - then the existing card allocation logic should handle the real-time card availability situation/allocation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Owlsroost, post: 1255543, member: 83973"] I think that's very likely - this post in the old thread I linked to earlier is a pretty good summary of the situation I suspect - [URL="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/threads/tv-server-conflictsmanager-plugin.128004/#post-1104663"]TV Server ConflictsManager plugin[/URL] Note that the (tuner) card allocation logic does use the concept of 'user' priorities - the 'scheduler thread' (which handles starting and stopping recordings) creates a separate temporary 'user' for each recording, but they are all at the same (very high) priority. Timeshift users are normally at a much lower priority (and will always be kicked off if a tuner is required for a recording). In theory it should be possible to handle the 'recording priority' situation by having the scheduler thread create temporary users with different priorities - then the existing card allocation logic should handle the real-time card availability situation/allocation. [/QUOTE]

Verification