Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RoChess" data-source="post: 1286011" data-attributes="member: 18896">Fair point on the others, so I might redo default. But for Star Wars, the Han Solo and Rogue One are stand-alone movies that had a shot at becoming their own series at a time. They are either somewhat of an origin stories such as with Han Solo, or they fill a gap in the story line of the main series. Nobody that wants to watch the &quot;Star Wars&quot; series will want to interrupt the two trilogies sequential order as they will have a hard time already deciding to watch it in 1-6 chronological order, or in theatrical release order of 4-6 first, followed by the 1-3 prequel.And massive amount of other spin-offs are planned by Disney.PS: Massive gasp you don't know the Star Wars franchise, and otherwise perfect time to start <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="RoChess, post: 1286011, member: 18896"] Fair point on the others, so I might redo default. But for Star Wars, the Han Solo and Rogue One are stand-alone movies that had a shot at becoming their own series at a time. They are either somewhat of an origin stories such as with Han Solo, or they fill a gap in the story line of the main series. Nobody that wants to watch the "Star Wars" series will want to interrupt the two trilogies sequential order as they will have a hard time already deciding to watch it in 1-6 chronological order, or in theatrical release order of 4-6 first, followed by the 1-3 prequel. And massive amount of other spin-offs are planned by Disney. PS: Massive gasp you don't know the Star Wars franchise, and otherwise perfect time to start (y) [/QUOTE]

Verification