Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RoChess" data-source="post: 888121" data-attributes="member: 18896">If it ain't broke, don't fix it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" />&nbsp;Because aside from minor quirks it (that usually have a workaround available), everything works very well. However IMDb+ has long gone be a project just for myself, so I do not mind at all to cater to other users as I would like them to enjoy their movie collection as much as I enjoy mine. And I don't mind a full rewrite to make it even more powerful, but have to be extremly careful not to break any actual function that everybody is used to right now.&nbsp;&nbsp;Yup, added those for sure.&nbsp;The movie order is messed up though, almost every movie in that list has a different followed-by order at imdb site. So I'll go with yours.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RoChess, post: 888121, member: 18896"] If it ain't broke, don't fix it :cool: Because aside from minor quirks it (that usually have a workaround available), everything works very well. However IMDb+ has long gone be a project just for myself, so I do not mind at all to cater to other users as I would like them to enjoy their movie collection as much as I enjoy mine. And I don't mind a full rewrite to make it even more powerful, but have to be extremly careful not to break any actual function that everybody is used to right now. Yup, added those for sure. The movie order is messed up though, almost every movie in that list has a different followed-by order at imdb site. So I'll go with yours. [/QUOTE]

Verification