Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bunker12" data-source="post: 240607" data-attributes="member: 22891">You can look at dcraw, a c program supporting roughly all &quot;raw&quot; formats output by digital cameras, and being actively maintained.<a href="http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/" target="_blank">Decoding raw digital photos in Linux</a>Personally I'd like to see support for &quot;raw&quot; images somehow in MediaPortal, with thumbnails. I can live without meta-data but I'd like to see some of that too. As a user I don't care as much wether it's integrated in MP or a supporting program.As far as reasons to support &quot;raw&quot; images, the main one is to me what has been said previously; I shoot in raw because it is an advantage for the post-processing. I can for example change color temperature (tone?) without any loss in quality. Converting to jpg DOES take time and a lot more hard-drive space. Typically a good quality jpg comes in at about 70-90 % of the original raw image from my Canon EOS DSLR.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bunker12, post: 240607, member: 22891"] You can look at dcraw, a c program supporting roughly all "raw" formats output by digital cameras, and being actively maintained. [url=http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/]Decoding raw digital photos in Linux[/url] Personally I'd like to see support for "raw" images somehow in MediaPortal, with thumbnails. I can live without meta-data but I'd like to see some of that too. As a user I don't care as much wether it's integrated in MP or a supporting program. As far as reasons to support "raw" images, the main one is to me what has been said previously; I shoot in raw because it is an advantage for the post-processing. I can for example change color temperature (tone?) without any loss in quality. Converting to jpg DOES take time and a lot more hard-drive space. Typically a good quality jpg comes in at about 70-90 % of the original raw image from my Canon EOS DSLR. [/QUOTE]

Verification