home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Things to do with the new TV engine
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ASiDiE" data-source="post: 63228" data-attributes="member: 11017"><p>Infinityloop, Let me explain a little bit more what I mean. I work for a company that has a product called ImageSilo. We are an online document management system and we host people's documents. We have 10 import servers. We have 10 servers that are constantly looking for new data. Each server runs a service. </p><p></p><p>So lets say you have your main PC, a media server (stores your movies and houses your capture cards) and the actually stand alone HTPC that you run Media portal on. This means for the most part, each computer is actually doing very little. If you could install the service on each computer to allow it use it's processing power for different jobs. Instead of 1 CPU with 100% use, you now have 3 CPUS's at 300%. </p><p></p><p>Lets say you have recorded 4 new shows and now you want to compress them all at night. Instead of 1 CPU running all 4 jobs, it would see that you have a total of 3 CPUS that can do the job. Things would get done a lot quicker. The downside to this, is you would be transferring the data over the network. This is usually not a problem unless you are using a slower wireless. </p><p></p><p>I am just totally throwing this out there. In MediaPortals case, it might not even work that well. There might not be any advantage to this if the network is slowing everything down, but I think it's a cool idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ASiDiE, post: 63228, member: 11017"] Infinityloop, Let me explain a little bit more what I mean. I work for a company that has a product called ImageSilo. We are an online document management system and we host people's documents. We have 10 import servers. We have 10 servers that are constantly looking for new data. Each server runs a service. So lets say you have your main PC, a media server (stores your movies and houses your capture cards) and the actually stand alone HTPC that you run Media portal on. This means for the most part, each computer is actually doing very little. If you could install the service on each computer to allow it use it's processing power for different jobs. Instead of 1 CPU with 100% use, you now have 3 CPUS's at 300%. Lets say you have recorded 4 new shows and now you want to compress them all at night. Instead of 1 CPU running all 4 jobs, it would see that you have a total of 3 CPUS that can do the job. Things would get done a lot quicker. The downside to this, is you would be transferring the data over the network. This is usually not a problem unless you are using a slower wireless. I am just totally throwing this out there. In MediaPortals case, it might not even work that well. There might not be any advantage to this if the network is slowing everything down, but I think it's a cool idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Things to do with the new TV engine
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom