home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
timeshiftbuffer does not get cleared on channelchange
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joboehl" data-source="post: 97571" data-attributes="member: 23490"><p>Well, it just feels wrong to me that it works the way it is now, but that just me. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I think that there are advantages in keeping the buffer, no doubt about that. But there are also drawnbacks. Most other PVR solutions work the other way, including MP and users migrating to the new engine might find this strange. </p><p></p><p>If this is a new feature that users might like, it should at least be a way to mimic the previous behavior. The bookmark idea for example is interesting. Another idea is to add another option to the timeshift nagivation (START, -30 minutes, -5 minutes, Last Channel Change) or something like that. </p><p></p><p>As for how hard it is find the channel change, that depends on a number of factors like how big is the timeshift buffer, how long has being since you changed the channels and etc. </p><p></p><p>I need to put this trough some testing and get some WAF and see how it goes. For me it feels strange, but then again, thats me. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joboehl, post: 97571, member: 23490"] Well, it just feels wrong to me that it works the way it is now, but that just me. :) I think that there are advantages in keeping the buffer, no doubt about that. But there are also drawnbacks. Most other PVR solutions work the other way, including MP and users migrating to the new engine might find this strange. If this is a new feature that users might like, it should at least be a way to mimic the previous behavior. The bookmark idea for example is interesting. Another idea is to add another option to the timeshift nagivation (START, -30 minutes, -5 minutes, Last Channel Change) or something like that. As for how hard it is find the channel change, that depends on a number of factors like how big is the timeshift buffer, how long has being since you changed the channels and etc. I need to put this trough some testing and get some WAF and see how it goes. For me it feels strange, but then again, thats me. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
timeshiftbuffer does not get cleared on channelchange
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom