Normal
I don't get why you wanna wrap idea 1 into a box called "macro" and call it idea 2.Maybe you can clear it up. Second suggestion looks like suggestion 1 wrapped in some container. Means: same stuffThe first approach wouldn't make the mapper more complicated at all. In fact nobody would notice the change at all as long as he doesn't need it. Also, if it would be implemented in the main core mapper in MP, everyone with a supported remote can benefit from this new feature, not just MCE remote people. Leave it all in one place, please. Much easier to maintain and same features should share the same code, not copying it.
I don't get why you wanna wrap idea 1 into a box called "macro" and call it idea 2.
Maybe you can clear it up. Second suggestion looks like suggestion 1 wrapped in some container. Means: same stuff
The first approach wouldn't make the mapper more complicated at all. In fact nobody would notice the change at all as long as he doesn't need it. Also, if it would be implemented in the main core mapper in MP, everyone with a supported remote can benefit from this new feature, not just MCE remote people. Leave it all in one place, please. Much easier to maintain and same features should share the same code, not copying it.
