home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
TV Server Crashes After Recording Ends
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sigpi007" data-source="post: 1116300" data-attributes="member: 133193"><p>Hey [USER=107951]@georgius[/USER] and [USER=82144]@mm1352000[/USER] ... just wanted to provide an update on my experience with this new filter. It generates some excess heat in my PC!</p><p></p><p>In the above thread... I did a lot of the testing on a dev environment which worked to get the new filter working in my particular situation (cable card / networked tuner). That worked great to remove the major issues. Now I've tried this filter out in my "production environment"... aka the family room TV... and noticed that the new filter increases the amount of CPU utilization by a reasonably noticeable amount during playback. I was watching a Blackhawks game and stopped to apply the new filter, and then started the game back up and noticed that my heatsink fan kicked on high after about 5 minutes of watching. I checked perfmon and saw that my CPU utilization was around 18-20% for MP during playback, when typically its more like 13% - 16% in my setup using the 1.x filter. </p><p></p><p>I know its not much, but the difference is enough to make the heat output jump enough to make the fan scream. I'm even more worried about this when recordings are happening in the background. (None were active during the game I was watching.)</p><p></p><p>Any thoughts? </p><p></p><p>Logs from the "production" setup attached. I had the new filter running from 21:17 to 21:35 if that helps. </p><p></p><p>(PS... Merry Christmas / happy holidays to you and yours. Thanks for all your work making MP a really awesome product.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sigpi007, post: 1116300, member: 133193"] Hey [USER=107951]@georgius[/USER] and [USER=82144]@mm1352000[/USER] ... just wanted to provide an update on my experience with this new filter. It generates some excess heat in my PC! In the above thread... I did a lot of the testing on a dev environment which worked to get the new filter working in my particular situation (cable card / networked tuner). That worked great to remove the major issues. Now I've tried this filter out in my "production environment"... aka the family room TV... and noticed that the new filter increases the amount of CPU utilization by a reasonably noticeable amount during playback. I was watching a Blackhawks game and stopped to apply the new filter, and then started the game back up and noticed that my heatsink fan kicked on high after about 5 minutes of watching. I checked perfmon and saw that my CPU utilization was around 18-20% for MP during playback, when typically its more like 13% - 16% in my setup using the 1.x filter. I know its not much, but the difference is enough to make the heat output jump enough to make the fan scream. I'm even more worried about this when recordings are happening in the background. (None were active during the game I was watching.) Any thoughts? Logs from the "production" setup attached. I had the new filter running from 21:17 to 21:35 if that helps. (PS... Merry Christmas / happy holidays to you and yours. Thanks for all your work making MP a really awesome product.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
TV Server Crashes After Recording Ends
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom