home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
TV Server Crashes After Recording Ends
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="georgius" data-source="post: 1118223" data-attributes="member: 107951"><p>It seems that filter is not fast enough to process data <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> As I check, data are received approx. 2393453 B/s (respectively 2394241 B/s without parser), but processed are approx. 663973 B/s (respectively 1588408 B/s without parser). So, with parser it is 3.6 times slower, without parser it is 1.5 times slower.</p><p></p><p>Try attached version, first test with parser and and second test without parser. I reverted buffer size to be same as in filter with no performance optimisations. I suppose that there will be some performance hit, but maybe filter will process data in time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="georgius, post: 1118223, member: 107951"] It seems that filter is not fast enough to process data :( As I check, data are received approx. 2393453 B/s (respectively 2394241 B/s without parser), but processed are approx. 663973 B/s (respectively 1588408 B/s without parser). So, with parser it is 3.6 times slower, without parser it is 1.5 times slower. Try attached version, first test with parser and and second test without parser. I reverted buffer size to be same as in filter with no performance optimisations. I suppose that there will be some performance hit, but maybe filter will process data in time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
TV Server Crashes After Recording Ends
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom