Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mike Lowrey" data-source="post: 690420" data-attributes="member: 88236">If you have a working(and stable) example i will of course have a look on it, but currently it's not the main aim of our engagement and thats mainly because of stability issues.As you already mentioned ipimp(currently the best way to go) isn't as stable as needed and gemx solution is also not very stable.If this is enough for you, no problem go forward, but i will not include a feature which isn't stable.It seems so, but i don't get what's the problem with them? I mean whether you need two service references or one is no real problem isn't it?...But for this &quot;more work&quot; you get two not interdependent services which hopefully are more stable.All in all, if you really don't like the way we go, no problem choose the solution which fits better to your needs.Well no offense but than they were not able to read, i've alway said that the service will not include the the cliend side part.Furthermore if you have a deeper look into the code of mpwebservice you will see that the streaming part isn't part of the service itself.And that's the same way we are going.If you need something like that you can have a look on gmawebservice.codeplex.com (developed by me and diebagger) and cheezys MPCC.PS:Keep in mind it's the first version!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mike Lowrey, post: 690420, member: 88236"] If you have a working(and stable) example i will of course have a look on it, but currently it's not the main aim of our engagement and thats mainly because of stability issues. As you already mentioned ipimp(currently the best way to go) isn't as stable as needed and gemx solution is also not very stable. If this is enough for you, no problem go forward, but i will not include a feature which isn't stable. It seems so, but i don't get what's the problem with them? I mean whether you need two service references or one is no real problem isn't it?... But for this "more work" you get two not interdependent services which hopefully are more stable. All in all, if you really don't like the way we go, no problem choose the solution which fits better to your needs. Well no offense but than they were not able to read, i've alway said that the service will not include the the cliend side part. Furthermore if you have a deeper look into the code of mpwebservice you will see that the streaming part isn't part of the service itself. And that's the same way we are going. If you need something like that you can have a look on gmawebservice.codeplex.com (developed by me and diebagger) and cheezys MPCC. PS: Keep in mind it's the first version! [/QUOTE]

Verification